[I]t is not an act of justice but of foolish injustice to pretend the sexes are the same.
—J. Budziszewski—
Key point: The idea that both sexes are identical and that individuals can choose which sex they will be places both individuals and society in bondage.
Go here for the contents page for this series at wordfoundations.org.
Harry Houdini (1874-1926) had reputation of being able to escape from any cell, box, trap, cage, or chamber—no matter how tight or secure. As an expert locksmith and escape artist, he would challenge anyone and everyone to find a means of confinement from which he could not break free.
A British bank heard of the challenge. Having installed a safe its officers believed to be completely secure, the bank’s leadership got in touch with Houdini and offered to let him try to crack their safe. The world-renowned performer confidently accepted and made his way to England.
On the appointed day and hour, Houdini was bound and placed inside the safe. The door then was closed, and the skillful showman began his normal routine. Houdini firmly believed breaking out would be a cinch. Why shouldn’t he? He’d perfected his craft through the years and had escaped confinement in one spellbinding scenario after another.
This time, though, a different situation emerged. After an hour, Houdini’s confidence began to weaken. He’d tried every approach he normally used, but to no avail. He continued working relentlessly but was unsuccessful at every turn. Sweat poured down Harry Houdini’s face as the master showman kept at it, but his efforts produced no breakthrough. Finally, after two hours of nonstop effort, Houdini was totally exhausted and leaned against the door to the safe. To his amazement, it swung open. It had been unlocked all along!
It’s true that several different versions of this story can be found—go here, here, and here for three additional versions—and some believe the incident never occurred. Others have found it plausible, however.
Assumptions Matter
Either way, the story illustrates a truth all people—Christians and non-Christians alike—would be wise to heed. Houdini was trying to open a door he assumed to be securely locked, only to find out it was merely shut—and not locked at all! Have you ever tried to complete a project and worked at it unsuccessfully, only to discover that your primary assumption about the situation was totally wrong?
To successfully and effectively accomplish a task, the person performing it needs to hold correct assumptions about it.
I believe this is what people who have embraced politically correct teachings on sexuality and gender identity are doing. Many, perhaps most, are doing this without understanding the ominous implications of their beliefs for themselves and society. Assuming the door to satisfaction and fulfillment regarding sexuality and gender to be locked, they’re trying to “pick the lock” with the false assumption that males and females essentially are the same. In this brand new Prager University video, Ashley McGuire, author of Sex Scandal: The Drive to Abolish Male and Female, explains. You can download a transcript of this video here.
I first want to echo Ms. McGuire’s plea for respect, compassion, and practical help for everyone experiencing gender dysphoria. Yet, as Ms. McGuire forthrightly declares, “we don’t need to overturn biologically defined sex differences to” preserve people’s dignity or to assist them. Misinformation on this subject abounds, and people need to hear the truth, both individually and corporately.
The cultural rhetoric on gender identity not only creates an atmosphere of frustration and confusion; it also exacerbates it! Moreover, it incites fear in the hearts of those who might otherwise consider challenging the politically correct line. Still, this is a dead end street! In the language of our illustration, it is a lock that cannot be picked!
What then, is the solution?
Affirm the Obvious!
The solution is both simple and profound, but it will be difficult for many to accept. In fact, it will be extremely difficult for some. Also, for some who accept it, believing this truth likely will be only the first step in a long and demanding process; yet it’s a process that will bring a person, at last, to freedom! The door already is unlocked!
The door already is unlocked!
Walt Heyer
Fulfillment and satisfaction in this area of life can be found in accepting reality as it is. This means accepting one’s biological sex and affirming it as good. It further means enjoying the characteristics one possesses as a boy or girl, man or woman—and celebrating the innate differences between males and females.
Walt Heyer agrees. Born a man, Walt transitioned to a woman, then later, back to a man. He now has a website dedicated to promoting the truth about the transgender movement. Its address is www.sexchangeregret.com. (Also go here and here.)
Fulfillment and satisfaction in the area of gender identity is found in accepting reality as it is.
We should add this important piece of information to the mix. A person does not have to be a Christian to acknowledge what nature teaches about the sexes. Being a Christian helps, certainly; because ultimate purpose and meaning in life are rooted in an understanding of having been created by a personal and loving God, in His image, and knowing Him in a personal way.
Even so, it is just as Ashley McGuire says:
The idea that gender-identification is now a personal choice might sound enlightened to some, but it’s actually a very anti-scientific view of one of the essential facts of life: men and women are inherently different. Their brains are different, their hormones are different, their chromosomes are different, and, of course, their bodies are different (emphasis added).
Denying the differences between males and females is anti-scientific!
Therefore, it doesn’t help, and it even is harmful, to deny the undeniable or to try to change the unchangeable. Here are 50 documented differences, generally speaking, between males and females.
To reiterate, acknowledging the differences between the sexes readily can, but doesn’t have to, rest on any religious principle or sentiment.
Actually, it’s just common sense.
Copyright © 2017 by B. Nathaniel Sullivan. All rights reserved.
Related articles:
Toxic Masculinity? Not in Las Vegas
A Boy’s Life with Unisex Scouts
This article — “Challenging a False Assumption” — has been adapted from an article in a series of posts on The Nashville Statement on Biblical Sexuality. You can access the series here.
The following articles are bonus articles in this series.
- Introductory article: Clarity Needed
- Flawless Design
- Challenging a False Assumption (this article)
- Relativism’s Flaws
- Twelve Qualities that Should Characterize the Church’s Case for Natural Marriage
- Upholding the Gospel also Means Upholding Natural Marriage
Unless otherwise indicated, Scripture has been taken from the New King James Version®. Copyright © 1982 by Thomas Nelson, Inc. Used by permission. All rights reserved.
Comments (0)