Published by admin On May 14, 2026

Redefining Marriage: A Journey Littered with Lawlessness and Radical Activism 2015/06/26

In a 5-4 decision released on June 26, 2015, the Supreme Court of the United States redefined marriage nationwide, mandating that same-sex couples be allowed to “marry” in every state in the union. At least two of the justices participating in the ruling should have recused themselves. Also, the U.S. Constitution never mentions marriage, so nothing in it requires a nationwide redefinition of marriage. Yet beyond even these concerns, the Court’s decision clashes head-on with reality.

The Supreme Court cannot change what marriage is any more than it can change what gravity is—but the effect of the ruling will be devastating for our country, especially for the children who will be deprived of mothers and fathers by intention and design.

As the debate over same-sex marriage raged in this country, Charles Colson made this observation: “The argument…is that to deny homosexuals marriage is manifestly unfair. But it’s not unfair. Gays and lesbians are not unworthy of marriage; they are incapable of marriage.”

Although incapable of marriage, same-sex couples will now have the opportunity to enter into a relationship recognized and sanctioned by the government, and it will be called “marriage.” When public policy collides with the truth, problems result, and the Supreme Court has opened the door for some very, very ominous problems for this country and its citizens. For these and many other reasons the Supreme Court’s ruling is illegitimate and should be resisted.

How did we get to this point? We do well to look back. The Supreme Court has acted irresponsibly and lawlessly, but along the way so have many lower courts, numerous state legislatures, and even some elected leaders. Citizens voted by the millions in their respective states to affirm man-woman marriage, but these laws and amendments, even though they were enacted by due process, have been overruled by judges who are not supposed to have lawmaking authority. What happened?  In a report written primarily during the latter part of 2014 and early 2015, I present some highlights.

The report is titled “Justice Denied.”

Copyright © 2015 by B. Nathaniel Sullivan. All Rights Reserved.

Unless otherwise indicated, Scripture has been taken from the New King James Version®. Copyright © 1982 by Thomas Nelson, Inc. Used by permission. All rights reserved.

http://www.usconstitution.net/constnot.html

https://www.bostonglobe.com/opinion/2015/06/26/supreme-court-marriage-equality-decision-unadulterated-judicial-activism/S3w8eDx94vIJ01Yd7JijUI/story.html 


Comments (0)

Leave a comment

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *

Recent Posts

Upholding Clarity in an Age of Confusion: The Nashville Statement, Part 4

Spiritual Warfare Is Serious Business "Cheshire Puss," she began, rather timidly, as she did not at all know whether it would like the name: however,…

Upholding Clarity in an Age of Confusion: The Nashville Statement, Part 5

Challenging a False Assumption [I]t is not an act of justice but of foolish injustice to pretend the sexes are the same. —J. Budziszewski— Key…

Upholding Clarity in an Age of Confusion: The Nashville Statement, Part 6

An Open Door [A] marriage with Christ at the center of it pulls you right out of yourself. It teaches each partner, the husband and…

Upholding Clarity in an Age of Confusion: The Nashville Statement, Part 7

Male and Female Differences Are Blessings from God Why didn't God make us all a combination of male and female, so we wouldn't be so…

Redefining Marriage: A Journey Littered with Lawlessness and Radical Activism 2015/06/26

In a 5-4 decision released on June 26, 2015, the Supreme Court of the United States redefined marriage nationwide, mandating that same-sex couples be allowed…

“Pro-Life” Evangelicals for Biden Aren’t Pro-Life, Even in the Ways They Think They Are 2020/10/08

Pro-life advocates should stop buying the premise that because we oppose the intentional killing of innocent human beings, we must take on other tragic societal…

Eight Things You Need to Know About the Heartbeat-Bill Movement 2019/07/21

This list includes an action point for Tennesseans. Heartbeat in Preborn Baby at Five Weeks and Five Days Gestational Age1 Key point: Heartbeat legislation not only…

The High Cost of Redefining the Term “Pro-Life” 2019/02

In an article titled “My Problem With Expanding Pro-life Definitions,” cultural observer and writer Ben Buera—who also is Catholic and very pro-life—says this. Photo by…

Nine Reasons God Will Judge New York and America for New York’s New Abortion Law—Unless We Repent, Part 1

Let’s be clear: The RHA is not a simple codification of Roe v. Wade, as advocates claim. Rather, the legislation has components that should be…

Nine Reasons God Will Judge New York and America for New York’s New Abortion Law—Unless We Repent, Part 2

[The effort to expand abortion to the point of birth, an effort that includes the RHA,] amounts to infanticide. It's the murder of fully developed…

Subscribe to Our Newsletter

Sign up today for free and be the first to get notified on new updates.

Enter your email address:

Delivered by FeedBurner